Your territory, the way your reps actually work it.

Most territory plans are a list of names and a radius on a map.

A radius is not a territory. Sixty minutes of driving in one direction is twenty miles; in another it is forty-five. Your reps know this. Your territory plan usually does not.

And a list of facilities tells you nothing about which ones need people this week.

Reps stop guessing which door to knock on. Managers stop arguing about territory. And when a contract comes up for bid, the pricing conversation starts from evidence instead of instinct.

Every level is the same build, the same page, and the same monthly refresh. What changes is whether you are inside a Connolly Works engagement, and how many markets you run.

Monthly is the same at any ring size. Build scales with the territory mapped: under 150 facilities 0.75× · 150–350 1.0× ($2,500) · 350–700 1.6× · 700–1,500 2.5× · over 1,500 quoted. Retained clients: build included, first four markets.

The engine is not medical. Drive-time geography, demand ranking, competitor mapping, burden and margin maths, win probability and the contract layer are industry-agnostic. What changes for another industry is the target list, the job titles searched, the size metric and the workers'-comp profile.

Skilled trades, hospitality, light industrial, education and childcare all map cleanly. So does the other side of the trade — accounting, tax and revenue-cycle firms, where a job posting signals capacity strain that outsourced support relieves rather than a seat to fill.

If distance and demand decide your territory, this works. Ask what your configuration would take.